Sounds like reasonable conjecture, but it is just that - conjecture.
Which means you can't use "history has proven" to make your case.
Not to say that it means you're wrong, but once you start to introduce
your own analysis, you need more justification than an appeal to history.
Also: "guerilla"
On 08/07/16 16:13, Pablo wrote:
> Sadly this isn't a revolution for two reasons, first, there's no guerrilla, the 'resistance' will be crushed by the state as soon as there's no more interest in keeping it alive, and second, most of the population won't support a marxist state. Democratic revolution is an oxymoron.
>
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <cjd@??? <mailto:cjd@cjdns.fr>> wrote:
>
> Not sure if this was meant as sarcasm but it raises a pretty solid point.
> I don't think there was ever a meaningful non-violent revolution except perhaps in India.
>
>
>
> On 08/07/16 15:57, Pablo wrote:
>
> Good luck escalating violence against the state, history has proven it surely is the best way to accomplish whatever you want.
>
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 7:55 PM, psy <epsylon@??? <mailto:epsylon@riseup.net> <mailto:epsylon@riseup.net <mailto:epsylon@riseup.net>>> wrote:
>
> Finally from #NuitDebout at Paris (31 March 2016/today)... the ninja
> award goes to....
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKVk_gz7_04
>
> #KeepYouBack
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>