On 25/06/16 17:34, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:27:54 +0100
> Rowland Penny <rpenny241155@???> wrote:
>
>
>> It is probably easier than that, the Samba 'configure' code has a
>> '--without-systemd' switch.
>>
>> Just need to alter debian/rules etc
>>

>> Rowland
>         *     *
>          \ o /
>           \|/
>            |               C O O L
>           / \  _
>          /   \/
>         /
>        -

>
> My suspicion is that the --without-systemd switch represents a huge
> defeat for Lennart and the Redhats. When Debian decided to switch in
> the summer of 2014, the systemd cartel were strutting and boasting that
> they would soon own the world.

I don't really know how to tell you this, but the switch (along with its
opposite '--with-systemd') was added to Samba by a red-hat employee.

Rowland

>
> Now, 2 years later, Samba, a bedrock "killer app" for Linux, still has
> a --without-systemd compile option. If Redhat had truly succeeded in
> their plans, such an option would be unneeded and useless in 2016.
>
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> June 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother?
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng