Simon Hobson <linux@???> writes:
> Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@???> wrote:
>> That's you're preferred set of workarounds.
>
> I suspect that we're all in "violent agreement" that different users
> (or types of users) have different preferences and priorities. In the
> general case there is definitely an issue to be solved - just
> different approaches to doing it.
>
>
> You appear to be approaching it from the PoV of an appliance
> builder. You have known hardware, can compile in all required drivers,
> and so the interface names (just based on discovery order/bus
> location) are deterministic until you alter something yourself.

I can neither count on being 'in control of hardware' nor on 'people
editing configuration files'. The ultimate goal of this outcome is a
kernel package which can be installed on any hardware this kernel
version supports by people who press an 'install' button.