On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:48:11PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> I would say that nowadays things like:
>
> - Mounting filesystems
> - Configuring networking
> - Configuring consoles
> - Launching daemons for different services
> - Offering logins
>
> are all part fo what I consider "system initialisation". Obviously, if
> you have exactly one filesystem, no networking, exactly one console,
> no daemon to run, and you don't mind using the system as "root", then
> initialisation can be reduces to 12 lines of code which run a
> shell. But then why on earth do yo need a multiuser-multiprogrammed
> operating system? you'd be better off using DOS...
You'd still be better off than DOS, having a usable shell and a better
file system.
Do you forget how bad DOS was?
-- hendrik
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ
>
> --
> [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ]
> [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ]
> [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ]
> [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ]
> [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
::
Re: [DNG] Mini init script written …
