> On June 13, 2016 at 9:57 PM Steve Litt <slitt@???> wrote:

> > Only issue with pale moon is the branding:
> > https://www.palemoon.org/branding.shtml
> >
> > Not sure if that's compatible with the main repo, maybe it needs
> > rebranding first?

> Yeah, just call it Bright Star, and swap the pale moon graphic with a
> beaming star. Then write the author, let him know what you did, and let
> him know that if he'd like the publicity benefit of having a major
> distro package Palemoon as Palemoon, he can write Devuan an official
> letter giving us permanent non-exclusive right to use the name and
> graphic, and we'll be glad to accommodate him with the publicity.

+10

I have an issue though with the non-exclusive right: it means anyone downstream from us has to drop the package or renegotiate.

This is why there is Iceweasel instead of Firefox.

Ask PM's maintainer what he really wants.

It's work, but a systematic rebranding of Palemoon with another theme (not Bright Star :-) might be another idea. PM has already done it for Firefox, so it should be easy to figure out what to do.

My vote: Europa. One of the coolest moons in the solar system. apt-cache search europa returns nothing.

> By the way, thanks to emninger's post, I've been using Palemoon as my
> main browser for almost a week, and it's head and shoulders better than
> ALL the rest. It's less bloaty than the other XUL browsers, and it's
> more stable than the webkit based browsers.

My thanks also, I have been using it too.

Peter Olson