On 2016-06-13 08:23, Jaromil wrote:

> we can create a group (named lxc?) and make you admins for it, or
> simply a single project as there may be no need for more packages.
>
> i'm cc: hellekin to stimulate a quicker response on what should be the
> naming scheme, since so far it has been curated with great attention
> to be meaningful. to me it makes sense to have something like
> 'virtualization-' as a prefix for repositories like lxc, but I'm also
> not sure what else would fall in there.

A generic name seems better. But I'm OK with whatever you think is
appropriate.