> On June 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM KatolaZ <katolaz@???> wrote:

[...]

> And my point is that we already have a powerful weapon to use against
> any power that wants to give a too-tight-hug to the free software
> community, and that weapon is called *copyleft* (not RMS, which would
> be quite a cumbersome weapon to wield anyway, given the mass involved
> :)).

I think my mass might be greater than RMS's, but I wouldn't qualify as a weapon.

RMS sets a standard of discourse about software freedom.

Copyleft is one instance of this, but he continues to illustrate issues that we might like to be concerned about.

Peter Olson