Steve Litt wrote:
> Katolaz
> > IMHO, if and when we would like to make a change regarding init
> > systems, that change should not be to replace sysvinit with an init
> > system of *our* choice, but probably towards allowing users to use the
> > non-invasive init of *their* choice.
>
> Yes. The user should have an easy choice of inits. What I meant was
> that SOME init must be default, and if that default init is ever not
> sysvinit, it should be something very different from sysvinit.
e.g. something without the complex run levels and symlink farms
of sysvinit.
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> May 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
--
Joel Roth
::
Re: [DNG] SoylentNews discussion
