On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:26:03 +0200, Irrwahn wrote in message
<f462818b-7967-6581-edcb-ba21b3c4990e@???>:

> On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:08:21 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 May 2016 09:51:20 +0100, dev1fanboy wrote in message
> > <49f74ba291012d3690f645b43a2f79c0.startmail@www.startmail.com>:
> >
> >> There's a good reason to keep things around too, in that you cannot
> >> be forced into a lock-in style upgrade.
> >
> > ..aye, and I see there may be a new bug-fix build coming out
> > of git that will need guinea pigs. ;o)
>
> The sarcasm is strong with this one.
>
> SCNR ;o)

..aye, leave those sarcasms for your own test reports. ;o)

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.