On Sun, 29 May 2016 16:46:22 +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I contest the idea that software has to be continuously developed.
> Eventually, proper development stop like what happens with a building.
> Then, maintenance follows. This means as long as software has bug
> fixes (maintenance), there would be no justified reason not to use it.

Correct. And in the SLiM case there has not been any noteworthy
maintenance for ~3 years, lest any bug fixes. It is in the process
of deterioration — just like an unmaintained building, to stay in
the picture.

Regards
Urban