On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:37:40AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
>
> Personally and daydreaming, on the longlong term :^) I'd rather
> appreciate an effort that ditches elisp alltogether, learning from the
> goods and bads of Emacs, and builds something on a more modern LISP
> interpreter like Guile2 or even better Clojure. I'm a big fan of the
> latter actually, its a pity that most editors written in clj are
> proprietary.

There is an editor written as part of the Racket version of Scheme.
It's part of its development environment.
I don't know how separable it is,

-- hedrik