+1

As a jwm user I would really like to see it brought up to date.

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Irrwahn <irrwahn@???> wrote:

> On Thu, 19 May 2016 17:48:33 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote:
> <snip>
> > Looking at the source package I cannot see a single
> > invasive patch WRT to the original source.
> <snip>
>
> Correction: I missed a patch when skimming over the
> package contents. I can see now what you meant by
> "Debianisms". Sorry for the confusion!
>
> A Devuan fork of jwm would make sense then, and it'd
> be a trivial one at that.
>
> Regards
> Urban
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>