Autor: Ozi Traveller Data: Para: dng Assunto: [DNG] Fwd: JWM Package worth the effort? was About subject lines
+1 JWM ;)
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Steve Litt <slitt@???>
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016 11:31:11 +0200
> <emninger@???> wrote:
>
>
> > PS. You didn't answer if it would be a reasonable effort to create a
> > JWM based desktop as an option for devuan ... :)
>
> I don't have an opinion on that. If I really loved JWM to death, I
> might make such a package. Or I might just compile from upstream source.
>
> I guess I'd respond like this: If there are one or two Devuanians who
> love JWM, they're better off compiling from upstream source. If there
> are five or ten JWM-loving Devuanians, better to make a package.
>
> I'm not really a JWM-lover, because I usually don't need a panel, and
> when I do, LXDE is good enough. The reason I choose LXDE over JWM is
> that LXDE does Alt+Tab like Bill Gates set it up (win95 was an
> incredible in its human engineering), whereas JWM does it in a way that
> screws me up.
>
> But of course, if I were ever to set up a GUI computer that used 128MB
> RAM, you'd better believe I'd use JWM. And there's something so
> Army-Surplus countercultural about JWM!
>
> SteveT
>
> Steve Litt
> May 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21 > _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
::
[DNG] Fwd: JWM Package worth the e…
