On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 07:49:04AM +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Rainer Weikusat <rainerweikusat@???> wrote:
>
> > But leaving these two general remarks aside, I don't quite understand
> > what you wanted to express.
>
> That "freedom of choice" is very important - as demonstrated by two posts setting out the reason why (for the poster's situation) the correct option is both one way and the other way. Ie one poster has set out why *for him* not respawning is the only correct way, while the other has set out why *for him* respawning is the correct way.
>
> So any system that enforces one or the other, or makes it very difficult to change, is *wrong*.

Exactly. That was exactly my point. I thought it ws more obvious than it turnned
out to be.

-- hendrik