On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:17:23AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green <mitt_green@???> wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> > >It's even worse than Autohell.
> > >
> > >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads
> > >to HTML ‎emails, too.
> >
> > Autohell vs Cmake once again. Seeing that the kde project switched
> > to cmake i guess it might be not so ugly aswell.
> >
>
> Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
> so ugly :)

There's a big big difference between switching to something and using
something because it was the only thing available twenty years ago and
it's not traditional.

The former would be on its real and imagined merits. The second
because you're part of the crowd.

-- hendrik