On 2016-04-18 17:11, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>> What do we (the DNG people) want for ascii ?
>>
>> My list starts as this:
>> * full init freedom, that is, all init methods being equally supported
>> (sysv, upstart, systemd) and nothing depending on any of them.
> Nope - systemd will never be supported it's impossible due to it's
> design.
>
>> * our own bug reporting system
> yes please
>
>> * a method for dividing Devuan in "cases" or "eggs" that do not
>> interfere with each other. E.g. the KDE egg, the LibreOffice egg, the
>> multimedia egg... maybe tasks with steroids?
> there could be some improvements to the dependency chains to be had,
> but overall I think this is unworkable.
>
>> * a rock-solid server platform for all architectures
> We already have this ;-)
>
>> * a sufficiently solid desktop and laptop platform for most usual
>> architectures
> This requires more work - but should be acheiveable by ascii
>
>> * Long Term Support for server whit a method for fast updating certain
>> packages (like virus lists)
> This is pretty much already there. What we need is a security team
> with
> sufficient resources to be able to patch long standing bugs in debian.
> Updated virus lists?? Linux doesn't get virus's...
>>
>> What do YOU want for ascii ?
>
> To show Lennart that he's so fundamentally wrong with systemd and his
> god complex attitude to software development.
>
>
+ 1 on everything ...
--
Stop slacking you lazy bum!