On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:32:27PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> NB: Just applying the init procedure to systemd based on the assumption
> that it will work like a well-behaved UNIX(*) program should is - how
> shall we say - a bit daring/ over-optimistic. There's presumably some
> kind of systemd-procedure which should be applied instead.

There should be no reaso systemd would not work like that. exec places it right
at the top of the process tree. I'm now curious to test this. Will do later.