:: [DNG] Delayed E-mails
Forside
Dette indlæg hører under følgende tråd:
MDet komplette tråd-træ sorteret efter dato
M 
M+\Simon Hobson den ->
Slet denne besked
Besvar denne besked
Skribent: Jim Murphy
Dato:  
Til: dng
Emne: [DNG] Delayed E-mails
Hi,

Did anyone else notice that at about 0726 UTC today
the mail server, I believe, spit out 3 emails that have "been
in hiding" for a while. Original sent dates:

Jan 11
Jan 24
Feb 24

If I'm reading the 3 attachments correctly, they were received
by the dng mail list server on the above dates and were
finally forwarded today.

In past threads on this list others have reported missing e-mails.
These may or may not be connected, but in case someone is
interested.

Anyway, FWIW.

Jim 

Delivered-To: srlinuxadmin@???
Received: by 10.55.170.66 with SMTP id t63csp817617qke;
        Wed, 6 Apr 2016 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.28.147.72 with SMTP id v69mr21724768wmd.79.1459927583883;
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dng-bounces@???>
Received: from tupac2.dyne.org (tupac2.dyne.org. [178.62.188.7])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 78si2281854wmw.56.2016.04.06.00.26.23
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=178.62.188.7;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dng-bounces@???
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39F11804E9;
    Wed,  6 Apr 2016 07:26:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: dng@???
Delivered-To: dng@???
Received: from unserver.de (unserver.de [88.198.20.135])
 by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E158180ED3
 for <dng@???>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.66] (unknown [5.159.58.40])
 by unserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 805602BD91
 for <dng@???>; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:16:21 +0100 (CET)
To: dng@???
References: <5690F1E7.4000404@???>
From: Stefan Mark <mark@???>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <5693E361.7090807@???>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 18:16:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5690F1E7.4000404@???>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RP_MATCHES_RCVD, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:26:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [DNG] Predictable Network Interface Names - Stupid or good idea?
X-BeenThere: dng@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The first mailinglist after debianfork.org" <dng.lists.dyne.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/dng/>
List-Post: <mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4919700283054742986=="
Errors-To: dng-bounces@???
Sender: "Dng" <dng-bounces@???>


This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--===============4919700283054742986==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="okT1t0hsQdSqbxAQHHb4eGibDST0crT1s"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--okT1t0hsQdSqbxAQHHb4eGibDST0crT1s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09.01.2016 12:41, Anto wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I have been indoctrinated myself that everything come from systemd gang=

> are stupid and bad. After reading the above link and some other pages
> from systemd supporters, I think I might have to change my mind about
> that Predictable Network Interface Names idea. But I am not entirely
> sure yet. What do you guys think about that?
>
I think it might be a good thing under certain circumstances. In the
me-and-my-laptop scenario its bad (i think). A Laptop has one ethernet
device and one wireless. With the old naming scheme they are called eth0
and wlan0. If i change the wlan module, it keeps wlan0. If i change the
notebook, eth0 stay eth0 and wlan0 stays wlan0. Same in a many 9most)
Desktops. One might add a usb network device, but (at least in my
experience), that device is only used temporaly.

In the overwhelming majority of use cases i have personally experienced,
the old naming scheme guaranteed that everything worked fine, even if i
changed stuff. The new scheme is guaranteed to break if i change stuff.
The naming scheme is not even really predictable. Did i had this
specific card used already? If so, which number does it had? If not,
which is the next unused number?
And in the few cases where the new scheme could offer improvement i
always name the cards by hand anyway.

So, in conclusion: usually the new scheme makes it worse for me, except
in the cases where i override it anyway.

But other people love it :)


--okT1t0hsQdSqbxAQHHb4eGibDST0crT1s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlaT42EACgkQRgAOgsOf+/kAJACePG+JAj3ijyzgpG98GMW4+1Et
qJMAn14RS7h304oSgohZXYbcIkHFjkua
=FQYD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--okT1t0hsQdSqbxAQHHb4eGibDST0crT1s--

--===============4919700283054742986==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KRG5nIG1haWxp
bmcgbGlzdApEbmdAbGlzdHMuZHluZS5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsaW5nbGlzdHMuZHluZS5vcmcv
Y2dpLWJpbi9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2RuZwo=

--===============4919700283054742986==-- 


Delivered-To: srlinuxadmin@???
Received: by 10.55.170.66 with SMTP id t63csp817706qke;
        Wed, 6 Apr 2016 00:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.158.98 with SMTP id wt2mr19826268wjb.102.1459927604772;
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dng-bounces@???>
Received: from tupac2.dyne.org (tupac2.dyne.org. [178.62.188.7])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10si1744557wjf.128.2016.04.06.00.26.44
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=178.62.188.7;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dng-bounces@???
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C030C180871;
    Wed,  6 Apr 2016 07:26:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: dng@???
Delivered-To: dng@???
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 575DA180F53
 for <dng@???>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:48:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([92.244.148.100]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPV69-1acW62334b-004g6M for <dng@???>;
 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:48:23 +0100
Message-ID: <56CD19F7.4060201@???>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:48:23 +0100
From: Twisted Fate <marezz@???>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dng <dng@???>
References: 20160213205301.GA8395@???
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+6ZHe4zBb62azV9Cnh8c+pLSO8rzCfcQ4CSjCmn6mA9PB1j6/Kr
 /ZHGataKmp7MjdSOeUYPz8AS1NyCwUDSHwJffO1ZQ1Vat8V9Kg3YdmcKhFVdX/iA8Nt9RTv
 H7ZCFHJqPSZLH3EtPimCDf2qVp1Bc3aZ4Ad3+ApxkFZ8bYq2yd7F4L90joFe/KCqnsFIkD9
 2SQQVBwnuopvXM1hq2xCw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:9rXMJGOiuMs=:K8EEOrTmStdFntCeLZ0WZU
 8TC2WfuAy+yz7HkmA6R0RuL+9cdNWJ5HDDLDAKoXxSunlq3YW3wSxxKnKBtC1DaaUU0qfp9Eu
 hKA1dVcMX58ql3d1aFQPp15DMDWHt6NiNc90XhH3eWOcl5iyfpOclT5r6LtuWPEfWNqv/43ia
 7bDi8XIutZGgIzxOPiN7Y1kppeiIiMRtaac8xhXYiOzBLab0ViOv4NbjlOX/k61oPQXjDEHEL
 qiI1n3SCjmhurWAok+74If0Fz5B6LCFkJVGRKGQXDRinkbOhV/nNctJoHTY4prF1W4UJctW7B
 VZ1jh6hEu9kftyQ6wlgez4YJJvqiBz14ry8pAMLp4hmTzuG0U3nOwFMLGkgIzWVU7Gj7ULR8z
 VY6XDnNLz2vLh64PzPv/5kPk9yy9aMqCw51CbId5MLaJ5X3xblAQ7iZjTnO/1QhN/PxCaMGwJ
 ovjQkCEMn7ZXmu40Cdjg06nrdL4auryP1fLZAogBfuL+JzXEubzu2WKduGaKZLUuOeQz4W/fb
 o4V/SioPvgsLU8nxmrigzx3iy2svudaAto5MZkkEhXejNd+sIHLm1vq8wuPXTrRxWNlIBSAWe
 4TiweF7uVipkqkAiAo/PIJzsY0FoWj9uQ0xdRXrpZFJfoSnIe68dQB+6j0KTCRUli2gNMktSF
 FiPHI/JURhAIp0L/aREa6w3dw/+iruZEUMXV4Gj5Ml1Qv3dwQ+w1WbdB9wBP7NkmAEuSfWs/T
 vJ75zbP8I5lEHP5WzIzsxltHwmK7a0y3Pg4NFHNDSsdSEUmwyFDcHdjMOKOd6luhx/gTmGf32
 V5OjP4j
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:26:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [DNG] Enlightenment anyone? ;)
X-BeenThere: dng@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The first mailinglist after debianfork.org" <dng.lists.dyne.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/dng/>
List-Post: <mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: dng-bounces@???
Sender: "Dng" <dng-bounces@???>

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 


Delivered-To: srlinuxadmin@???
Received: by 10.55.170.66 with SMTP id t63csp817664qke;
        Wed, 6 Apr 2016 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.227.1 with SMTP id rw1mr16453324wjc.62.1459927594665;
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <dng-bounces@???>
Received: from tupac2.dyne.org (tupac2.dyne.org. [178.62.188.7])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k10si1772350wjn.38.2016.04.06.00.26.34
        (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=178.62.188.7;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of dng-bounces@??? designates 178.62.188.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dng-bounces@???;
       dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
    by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F911805BB;
    Wed,  6 Apr 2016 07:26:19 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: tupac2.dyne.org; dkim=fail
    reason="verification failed; unprotected key"
    header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ji+t1x8m;
    dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
X-Original-To: dng@???
Delivered-To: dng@???
Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by tupac2.dyne.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11CAD18095D
 for <dng@???>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:10:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l65so31983222wmf.1
 for <dng@???>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 02:10:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QKvuWFu5oiszhVrtjReKjECMsQtEqZHkagV5X1VZxNE=;
 b=ji+t1x8mnYPws9uEhXD+1nBJqDBI9zxfSrkmRjvdkJ2AHSvDRbSizfS6K93ngDCeaU
 ssNlO6TF/teOJJ240Q/bRx+pHWrE6evBxufijXbddf+hnzZ/byFA5iCS5yGQqY/HhE3e
 o0/darUwE1bQWG3f6hMrQV18M6FdWSyTXYQaNA02T9gRKo3EQO8q4r5XW7cuDV3EP14I
 qNKpKEiK2PR2YM47RAY0uGalffAmM3phFSNgu19WP8th4tw4GukuqgUsoyoaGyPr9ViX
 rOmXxxL+Yj4MU2aIG5qoNz06GCQ2dxHdVXION+/mzRjpqbBwKzKtu/v46A9mRFAjtVxo
 en8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent
 :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=QKvuWFu5oiszhVrtjReKjECMsQtEqZHkagV5X1VZxNE=;
 b=mmigHFKTWui4Du6PyaHwfPFz8myOwKykyyqdRBPgldfa+WtTIbaC4WnMWh3sWHP9sZ
 95lLpBeebX7uIbivp2dIll0UH9j+Cuu2uMSBJ46K1WE2JORHUdKDmHhKc0a705oz8qIv
 6vTKyIe52QB7wpE7LQjbEC5y1ON/hEB1X9iaCKEvDCCv9NQHLB/8fvZmYdBDiqbNIGt7
 axtu4PsPWjTeDo4P3xKLA9NAkg0xNcIfvasIFFhZ/e/qsVW2RR0j3jO6oCeuD2pkEpBt
 7Iwb2CPAFtGKYx+94MxP5jytiuE30zdiWDNnvGuoOfNNfr5GS4xWdlxRNHYgMDr4yFt7
 dsdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSRcEkEJXUNcO780hYGi9NeQ50By7syW/s4o+mIkn1WFNrdrtUIcaCVdBrgD5L8lA==
X-Received: by 10.195.18.5 with SMTP id gi5mr11852352wjd.167.1453630198159;
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 02:09:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (93-87-246-108.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs.
 [93.87.246.108])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm13846057wjy.41.2016.01.24.02.09.57
 for <dng@???> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 02:09:57 -0800 (PST)
To: dng@???
From: Vojin Vidanovic <vojinvidanovic@???>
Message-ID: <56A4A2F4.50503@???>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:09:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux ppc64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
 DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tupac2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:26:16 +0000
Subject: [DNG] Any chance of PPC64 fork?
X-BeenThere: dng@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The first mailinglist after debianfork.org" <dng.lists.dyne.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/dng/>
List-Post: <mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng>, 
 <mailto:dng-request@lists.dyne.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: dng-bounces@???
Sender: "Dng" <dng-bounces@???>

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Dette indlæg blev indsendt til følgende postlister:
dng
Postlisteoplysninger | Naboindlæg		<-[DNG] Booting from newly created squashfs image with legacy grub?Re: [DNG] ...and when trolling went too far->

Donate to Dyne.org

dyne.org open discussions
administreres af dyne.org hackers		Lurker (version 2.3)