:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Panama Papers
Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Cristina
Fecha:  
A: unsystem
Asunto: Re: [unSYSTEM] Panama Papers
On 04/04/16 21:18, Cristina [efecto99] wrote:
> On 04/04/16 20:53, Kyle Torpey wrote:
>>
>>
>> Editor of Süddeutsche Zeitung responded to the lack of U.S.
>> individuals in the documents, saying "Just wait for what is coming next"
>>
>> https://twitter.com/mathewi/status/716771686482202625
>>
>> --
>> @kyletorpey <http://twitter.com/kyletorpey>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:34 PM, <menuxi@???
>> <mailto:menuxi@riseup.net>> wrote:
>>
>>     http://interactive.fusion.net/dirty-little-secrets/

>>
>>     does anyone else find it too suspicious that only the enemies of
>>     America showed up on this list, aside from Iceland?

>>
>>     It could be quite possible that the American government could be
>>     trying to destabilize other governments by leaking sensitive info
>>     to the press that shows the corruption of world leaders that pose
>>     a threat to american interests. Obviously, this doesn't make the
>>     leaks any less valid.

>>
>
> Yes, since the "investigation/leak" was revealed yesterday there were
> several ( but still few) voices saying that.
>
> Today i found this: "Where are all the Americans in the
> Panama Papers?"
> http://fusion.net/story/287671/americans-panama-papers-trove/
>
> Yesterday I got this from@Miss_Cybernaut :
> <https://twitter.com/Miss_Cybernaut>
> https://briankilmartin.cartodb.com/viz/54ddb5c0-f80e-11e5-9a9c-0e5db1731f59/public_map
> <https://twitter.com/Miss_Cybernaut>
> it seems the only media that published it, where US had this mention:
> country United States / companies 3072 / clients 441 / beneficiaries
> 211 / shareholders 3467
> but still "no names" until now.
>
>
> The "curious" fact for me, after find in fact mentions to US citizens
> involved, is than the consortium took 1 year to investigate the
> documents, and on the 1st revelation, the "boom", they avoid to
> mention US. ¿¿???
> They "leave it for later" as if we were talking about a lost island on
> the end of the world.
>
> Lots of us are asking about the documents. I believe the leak is real
> but clearly manipulated.
>


more specific:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article69918377.html

99