On 2016-03-20 15:45, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 20/03/2016 10:35, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>> I agree that there is little point in putting
>> effort into packaging something that isn't currently in a functional
>> state. If you could share the details of your testing so people can
>> replicate and perhaps help with the development that would mean that
>> this discussion has not been useless, but instead useful in teasing
>> out
>> details that at least I had previously missed.
>>
>> Thank you for this vital update Didier;-)
>
> I have sometimes difficulties to express things in an understandable
> way :-)
>
> I expect Jude has tested his last version and I suspect he did it with
> the files under /usr/local and it worked. On my side, I tested it
> under the FHS but with a different OS and it failed. I dunno where the
> error is. One possibility is that the problem is in the misplacement
> of some file(s) or error in some config file.
What error, what happens or is it merely not working?
Did you check log-files?
Latest version works for me under Arch based OS although there are some
question marks for me regarding using vdev and devtmpfs together but I
have open
issues on github for those.
>
> Brief inventory of the files installed on my test bench:
> /sbin/vdevd
> /lib/vdev: 11 executable binaries and 27 scripts
> /lib/vdev/hwdb: one script and a squashfs filesystem (maybe left over
> from building)
> /lib/vdev/hwdb/input: 14 text files
> /etc/vdev/ifnames.conf
> /etc/vdev/vdevd.conf
> /etc/acls: 3 files
> /etc/actions: 76 text files
>
> Not only must these more than 150 files be in the right places,
> but also vdevd and the other executables must look for them in the
> right places.
>
> BTW, any news from Jude?
>
> Didier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng