On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 09:01:32AM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 20/03/16 08:56, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> > Jude organized the package like this for people to test it on
> > running systems without interfering with the existing hotplugger. Vdev
> > would create device files and other descriptive files under
> > /usr/local/dev. But, of course it was not meant to remain like this if
> > Vdev was to be the hotplugger in charge.
> >
> > If it's worth, you might leave it like this until you can get it to
> > work and then switch to a normal file hierarchy when ready.
> >
> I strongly disagree. If it's to be packaged, it should be packaged
> properly in keeping with Debian policies (which Devuan has adopted) with
> regards to FHS and location of parts.
>
> Vdev being an essential system tool should be in the root hierarchy.
It isn't an essential system tool until it works. So if it'sstill
being tested, it better not be essential.
Still, I'm eagerly awaiting the package, essential or not.
-- hendrik
::
Re: [DNG] Packaging Vdev
