On 03/14/2016 09:04 PM, Daniel Reurich <daniel@???> wrote:
> On 15/03/16 02:41, aitor_czr wrote:
>> >
>> >On 05/03/16 13:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>Something like this?
>>> >>
>>> >>0.1.20160314+1deb1
>> >
>> >Sorry:
>> >
>> >0.1.jude20160314+1deb1
> 0.1.jude20160314-1 is the correct way (according to debian policy).

I wanted to say +deb1uX

Currently, debian stable is using +deb8uX

Isn't it?

Aitor.