On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:31:10PM +0000, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Didier
>
> >Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
> >>>I'd suggest using a version like:
> >>>0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1
> >>>
> >>>That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
> >>>version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.
>
> Something like this?
>
> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>
> I was purposing something like this:
>
> 0.1.d5d965-jessie1
>
> There is not a great difference between both. If you prefer to use
> the date instead of the short commit, i will do so.

The whole point with version numbers is to be able to compare them to
know which is more up-to-date. Wouldn't using a hash conflict with
this?

-- hendrik