On 15/03/16 01:51, Mat wrote:
> On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote:
>> Hi Daniel, Didier
>>
>>> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>>>>> I'd suggest using a version like:
>>>>> 0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1
>>>>>
>>>>> That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
>>>>> version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.
>>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>>
>> I was purposing something like this:
>>
>> 0.1.d5d965-jessie1
>>
>
> Isn't this one of the typical use-cases of the "epoch" field in debian
> version strings?

Yup, but we can avoid them for this temporary situation until proper
versioning is established.


--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722