On 05/03/16 14:31, aitor_czr wrote:
> Hi Daniel, Didier
>
>> Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
>>> > I'd suggest using a version like:
>>> > 0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1
>>> >
>>> > That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
>>> > version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.
>
> Something like this?
>
> 0.1.20160314+1deb1
>
> I was purposing something like this:
>
> 0.1.d5d965-jessie1
>

Isn't this one of the typical use-cases of the "epoch" field in debian
version strings?

https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version

Sorry if I repeat something that has been mentioned already, I didn't
follow the whole thread.

--
Mat <mat@???>