On 13/03/16 20:36, Brad Campbell wrote:

> I've snipped the remainder of your un-informed rant.
>

Sorry, that was un-called for.

Never the less, tightvnc works a hell of a lot better over super low
bandwidth links than I've ever managed to get out of RDP or straight
remote X. Plus, none of the compressing/caching X proxies have ever
worked right, whereas spinning up an x11vnc instance and using tightvnc
as a viewer has always been a quick and very efficient way of getting a
graphical console on low bandwidth without needing any configuration on
the remote end.