Am Samstag, 12. März 2016 schrieb KatolaZ:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > > good to have a pivuan for armv6 + FP2 for rpi0, but it is true that
> > > with the new rpi3 it would be far better and easier to invest time in
> > > a pivuan for armhf, which is what aitor is rightfully doing. The
> > > packages are already there, and there is no need to support another
> > > port...
> >
> > ..this means Devuan is _not_ the answer for the millions of
> > armv6+FP2/rpi0/1 users out there.
> > Pity, we could have used them here.
> >
>
>
> I haven't said I gave up on the rpi0/1 port of Devuan. I have said
> that it would be difficult to maintain it, if we ever get to put it in
> place.

I might miss the whole point of this discussion, but I have a RPi 1 A + fvwm + devuan running without any problem. But it started with the "official" wheezy raspbian image ...

Nik



--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.