On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:

[cut]

> > good to have a pivuan for armv6 + FP2 for rpi0, but it is true that
> > with the new rpi3 it would be far better and easier to invest time in
> > a pivuan for armhf, which is what aitor is rightfully doing. The
> > packages are already there, and there is no need to support another
> > port...
>
> ..this means Devuan is _not_ the answer for the millions of
> armv6+FP2/rpi0/1 users out there.
> Pity, we could have used them here.
>


I haven't said I gave up on the rpi0/1 port of Devuan. I have said
that it would be difficult to maintain it, if we ever get to put it in
place.

HND

KatolaZ

--
[ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
[ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
[ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]