"T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes:
> On 2016-03-01 23:41, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> "T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes:
>> > On 2016-03-01 20:22, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> >> "T.J. Duchene" <tj@???> writes:
>> >> > On 03/01/2016 08:15 AM, dng-request@??? wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > I'd just like to offer my opinions on the subject of Debian/Devuan
>> >> > libraries, linking and so on. This is just an opinion, so no one has
>> >> > to agree by any stretch of the human imagination, nor do I feel it
>> >> > necessary to defend it.
>> >>
>> >> It's not "just an opinion", it asserts quite a few things which are at
>> >> least worded in a very scarily sounding and vague way, if not outright
>> >> wrong.
>> >
>> > I am sorry you took it that way. I was just keeping it "simple" as I
>> > said. =)
>>
>> And I disgree with your assessment of this being "a simplified"
>> description, instead of a fairly complicated and seriously deceptive
>> one.
>
> I've mentioned that it was possible to support multiple versions of
> the same library. The exact mechanics of why or how do not matter in
> saying so on this list. I see no reason to stray further from that.

If this text was supposed to have a relation to anything I wrote in the
two e-mails on this, it certainly escapes me completely.