:: Re: [DNG] A heads up about xfce's f…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Edward Bartolo
日付:  
To: KatolaZ
CC: dng, T.J. Duchene
題目: Re: [DNG] A heads up about xfce's future
Hi,

I tried icewm, jwm, wmaker and now I am trying fluxbox which looks
like a promising candidate. However, fonsts are painfully small on my
17.3 inch laptop screen.

With fluxbox can I configure:
a) font sizes, types and styles
b) use a wallpaper
c) increase the height of the taskbar and the font sizes it uses
d) make the general look more esthetically appealing

Edward

On 01/03/2016, KatolaZ <katolaz@???> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Like, I assume many, on this mailing list, know what to do when they
>> opt not to install the default window manager or desktop. However, I
>> think, XFCE is a good choice, although on my T4400 2GB computer it
>> tends to be rather heavy. Window managers are attractive with respect
>> to low resource use, but they are unattractive with respect to user
>> configuration unless somebody in Devuan decides to write a script or
>> an executable to automate user configuration of the most popular
>> window managers. The latter is a job I don't know as I have never
>> configured a window manager. My eyes, although perfectly healthy, are
>> quite dictatorial to me. I need good readability and small fonts are
>> out of question to me as they cause too much eye fatigue. I also need
>> to have control of display brightness as average brightness is too
>> insense for me.
>>
>> I think, window manager user configuration more or less rests on these
>> tasks:
>> a) configure some menu structure to access user programs
>> b) configure a keyboard structure to access user programs
>> c) configure wallpaper and screen saver
>> d) adjust font sizes and screen brightness
>>
>
> Hi Edward,
>
> some of the most widely used window managers ship with a configuration
> tool which allows to do tune those things with a few clicks. This is
> true for instance in WindowMaker, where WPrefs can configure almost
> all the configurable options. This is however not true for other
> window managers, especially tiling ones, which usually have just a
> configuration file for that, and assume that vi is the best way to
> configure your environment (which is not totally bullshit, indeed).
>
> Unfortunately, the screensaver is another story, mainly for historical
> reasons, and brightness adjustment often depends quite heavily on
> your hardware...
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ
>
> --
> [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ]
> [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ]
> [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ]
> [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ]
>