Hi,

I am not a systemd supporter, what I am, is someone who wants
GNU/Linux to retain its flexibility. Systemd's aim appears to be that
of limiting differences between Linux machines to a minimum. Such a
minimum would not exist with users having the freedom to manage and
set up their Linux OS the way they want. I find this limitation a
demotivator to use Linux instead of other OSs like OS X and MS
Windows.

If I am given the same OS recipe, why should I bother myself to use
another OS that mimics what has been available for years?

Edward

On 21/02/2016, Didier Kryn <kryn@???> wrote:

> Le 20/02/2016 21:58, Mitt Green a écrit :
>>      Edward Bartolo wrote:

>>
>>
>>> >I think systemd is aimed at desktop users assuming that most
>>> >Linux users are also desktop users.
>> LOL, since when most Linux users are desktop users?
>> Linux market share on desktop is around 1-2%, while on
>> servers open-source operating systems maintain around 90%
>> (count here BSD's also) - different sources, ye know, not
>> exact numbers.
>

>      Yet there still might be more Linux desktops than servers. But this
> isn't the question. The reality is that the desktop and tablet market,
> is the goal of Gnome, KDE and Freedesktop in general. These want to
> share the market of Apple. Therefore they just copy the Mac-OS model.

>

>      Didier

>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>