:: Re: [DNG] Are you still paranoid if…
Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Arnt Karlsen
Date:  
À: dng
Sujet: Re: [DNG] Are you still paranoid if you turned out to be right?
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:36:54 -0500, Steve wrote in message
<20160212213654.35944b76@???>:

> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:40:18 -0800
> GoOSSBears <acohen36@???> wrote:
>
> > --- slitt@??? wrote:
> > From: Steve Litt <slitt@???>
> > To:
> > Subject: [DNG] Are you still paranoid if you turned out to be right?
> > Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:53:15 -0500
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > For those of you who remember the most unpopular stuff I said on
> > > Debian-User, the stuff I said about Red Hat, the stuff people
> > > called me a conspiracy theorist for: Am I still paranoid if it
> > > turned out I was right?
> >
> > IIRC, the very last time you posted on Debian-User was back on 22
> > Oct 2014 [01][02]. So would you care to elaborate what those
> > previous D-U posts were where you said the "unpopular stuff" on RH,
> > among your D-U postings that year from March[03], April[04],
> > May[05], June[06], July[07], August[08], September[09], and/or
> > October[10] ??
> >
> > TY
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/10/msg00800.html
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/10/msg01808.html
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/09/msg01356.html
>
> There are more, but it's difficult because the Debian archives aren't
> searchable. Anyway, these three give you the feel for what I'm talking
> about.


..you were too naïve and not nearly paranoid enough:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS

..our dear Lennart explained my Sid networking problems: ;o)
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Systemd-2016-FOSDEM
(or https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JNdeIs9jR8 )


..has anyone tried decompile their /lib/systemd trees?

--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.