Hi Daniel and Edward,

El 12/02/16 a las 06:09, aitor_czr escribió:
> On 02/12/2016 02:51 AM, Daniel Reurich <daniel@???> wrote:
>>> Where can i find documentation about this other method? I've never used it.
>>> >
>>> >Are the existing *.git files generated by this format? See, for example,
>>> >the case of gdisk:
>>> >
>>> >http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/pool/main/g/gdisk/
>>> >
>>> >There isn't any tarball in the repository...; a git file, instead.
>>> >
>>> >Although after downloading the sources of the project i find the same
>>> >3.0 (quilt) format in "debian/source/format", any 3.0 (native).
>>> >
>>> >Thanks in advance,
>>> >
>>> > Aitor.
>> It's only used for packages that debian|devuan build for themselves.
>> Look at the likes of debootstrap and other debian specific packages.
>
> Thanks, i had a look at the latest commits in edward's git repository,
> changing from DebSrc 3.0 (quilt) to DebSrc 3.0 (native) and removing
> all the stuffs related with quilt.
>
> Aitor.

In summary:

1) DebSrc 3.0 (native) generates only a tar.gz, containing also the
debian folder. There is not a debian branch, and this is the reason why
Edward changed the version number from 0.1.1-1 to 0.1.1 in debian/changelog.

2) DebSrc 3.0 (quilt), instead, generates an orig.tar.gz and a
debian.tar.gz separately. So, the version number must include the
version in the debian branch, this is 0.1.1-1

On the other hand, i cloned gdisk:

https://git.devuan.org/pkg-admin/gdisk.git

It uses the 3.0 (git) format, and now dpkg-guildpackage generates a
binary file:

*gdisk_1.0.0-2+devuan0.4.git*


Cheers,


Aitor.