YES

NETMAN has been around as a standalone mainframe network/system automation
product since at least the 90s on MVS/ESA, and later moved into workload
manager under z/OS but it is still known and referred to as NETMAN. CA also
has a product called NETMAN for mainframe systems, I suppose because IBM
never trademarked it.

BOTH organizations are quite litigious, not to mention the confusion among
a significant segment of the population as to which platform is in context.

Plus, I never liked the name then. Sounds like pigman, or spiderman, or a
guy who supplies fishing nets.

SWS

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:18 AM, aitor_czr <aitor_czr@???> wrote:

>
> On 02/04/2016 12:47 PM, Edward Bartolo <edbarx@???>
> <edbarx@???> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This mail thread is intended to collect votes regarding netman's name
> change. The question is:
>
> Do you agree to renaming netman?
>
> The answers should be YES and NO. No long replies needed, I will
> adhere to the outcome vote.
>
> The poll will be open until 11 February 2016.
>
> Edward
>
>
> NO.
>
> 'Netmgr' already exists in Oracle.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>
>