> Le 25/01/2016 13:23, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
> >     while (*r) if (*r++ == '/') n = r;

>     Does it mean

>     while (*r)
>       {
>         if (*r == '/')
>     {
>            n = r;
>            r++;
>         }
>       }

>     while (*r)
>       {
>         if (*r == '/')
>     {
>            r++;
>            n = r;
>         }
>       }

>     I think the second answer is the good one. It is more readable
> and less error-prone than your example and the compiler will produce
> exactly the same instructions. You don't need to do the work of the
> compiler; it does it better. Better concentrate on writing programs
> easier to read and less error-prone. These pre-increment and
> post-increment instructions should be deprecated - I already
> advocated that on this list, although it is not the place :-)

>     The reason why seasonned programmers prefer the kind of
> expression you wrote, with post-increment, is a perfect example of a
> style dictated by pure aesthetics. This an error I used to make when
> I was younger, but, with age and learning, I have found true reasons
> to do otherwise.

>     Didier

>     Didier