On Tue, 12/29/15, Jim Murphy <srlinuxadmin@???> wrote:

Subject: Re: [DNG] What's "Armstrong"? (was: Fw: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0)
To: "dng" <dng@???>
Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2015, 6:57 PM

On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Rainer Weikusat
<rainerweikusat@???> wrote:
> Steve Litt <slitt@???> writes:
>> My response is below the original message. I can't respond on
>> debian-user, because I have Armstrong Syndrome...
>
> I've so far learnt that it's "Don Armstrong" who seems to be a Debian
> maintainer. But that's surely not a household word in itself.
>

Steve sited in a previous thread "Our friendly community" that Armstrong
fixed it so he(Steve) couldn't post there. I guess you can say he was
"strong armed". Steve didn't go into details of why.

Jim

--------------------------------------------

Ah . . . those were the days. Steve and I were very vocal about our disapproval of Debian adopting systemd on -user. Don Armstrong was (maybe still is) 'the enforcer'. I got at least one warning - maybe more. Steve got the boot . . . His description would undoubtedly be more informative and entertaining than mine. :)

golinux