On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 02:35:39PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > (Why /mnt ?)
>
> Tradition. It exists on all distros I've ever seen, and it's used for
> mountpoints. Do you think the more modern, file manager-centric /media
> would be a better choice? That would be no more difficult.

Here's another good reason: /mnt is quicker and easier to repeatedly
type than /media. I'd say mount as /mnt/sdd1, /mnt/sdd2, ... Just my
$0.01 worth.

Greg


--
web site: http://www.gregn.net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)
If we haven't been in touch before, e-mail me before adding me to your contacts.

--
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager@???