Mitt Green <mitt_green@???> writes:

[...]

> - RedHat doesn't own systemd
> (https://www.happyassassin.net/2013/11/28/the-problem-with-systemdred-hat-conspiracy-theories-red-hat-does-not-own-systemd/);

The problem with uninformed claptrap like that is that it's uninformed
claptrap. Whether or not code written by Lennart Poettering while
employed by RedHat ends up being copyrighted by RedHat or Lennart
Poettering depends on the terms of his employment contract and on
applicable legislation. The Canonical-policy wrt is known to be
different from the RedHat policy.

BTW, what's "Cons-piracy"?

(defun pirate-cons (l)
       (let
        ((x (cdr l)))
        (setf (cdr l) (cddr l))
        (setf (cdr x) nil)
        x))

?