On 18/12/15 17:18, Mitt Green wrote:
>
> No, the actual work on packages that remove libsystemd0 dependency.
> I've done quite of it for my machine. Notable examples include
> angband repositories apart from Devuan's own. Adam made a big
> base removing the dependency.

But why? What badness does libsystemd0 do?

I can understand working on replacements for libpam-systemd, that is a
big problem for people who don't want systemd, but libsystemd0 seems
pretty benign.

>
>> Funny, I thought Devuan was about choice.
> A choice not to use systemd at all.

If I wanted to I could run Debian without systemd. Some things wouldn't
work, but as I understand it those things don't work on Devuan either.
What more choice does Devuan give me?