Le 11/12/2015 09:01, aitor_czr a écrit :
> Hi Katolaz,
>
> Here you are an example of two arguments (x,y) passed by reference:
>
> # include <stdio.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
>
> int i=1;
> int j=2;
>
> printf( "i = %d j = %d \n", i,j);
>
> func(&i, &j);
>
> printf( "i = %d j = %d \n", i,j);
>
> return 0;
>
> }
>
> void func(int *x, int *y)
> {
> int k = *x;
> *x = *y;
> *y = k;
> }
>
> This is the output:
>
> i = 1 j = 2
> i = 2 j = 1
Aitor, you can tweak the things as you like but the fact is that
the backbone of the design of the C language is that the API is as close
as can be to the ABI. In terms of passing the argument, there is no
other ABI than putting their values in registers and/or in the stack.
Hence the arguments have the same status, for the called function, as
automatic and/or register variables. The values they have when the
function returns is lost.
There is an exception for arrays. Arrays, in C, are not data types;
the [] notation in a declaration merely allocates a range of memory; the
same notation in instructions provides essentially another way to write
pointer arithmetics and the array name itself is treated as a pointer.
Reference is a concept of higher level languages; in addition to
the address, it caries information about the data type and size. I must
say the syntax is confusing, when using references, since it is often
identical wether you use the variable or a refenrence to it. At least it
is confusing to a C programmer who tends to associate reference and address.
My one cent.
Didier
::
[DNG] Reference in C -- was Re: Poi…
