Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money in
play?

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Linux O'Beardly <linux.obeardly@???>
wrote:

> Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how
> ignorant and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole systemd fiasco
> since it's inception. Also, the one person that really astounded me at his
> concession to systemd was Shuttleworth. I figured if anyone were going to
> fight the fight, it would be him. I've never been so disappointed in a
> visionary I previously admired. Hopefully, one of them will eventually
> come around and make a stand.
>
> Linux O'Beardly
> @LinuxOBeardly
> http://o.beard.ly
> linux.obeardly@???
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Emiliano Marini <
> emilianomarini82@???> wrote:
>
>> Interesting article from Richard Stallman.
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html
>>
>> It starts with:
>>
>> *"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But
>> not only the code. Since documentation files including manuals, README,
>> change log, and so on are essential technical parts of a software package,
>> they must be free as well."*
>>
>> And concludes with:
>>
>> *"As new situations arise, the GNU Project and the Free Software
>> Foundation will adapt our freedom criteria so as to lead computer users
>> towards freedom, in practice and in principle."*
>>
>> Maybe RSM has some concern about Red Hat, systemd and the new idea of
>> "freedom of code vs. freedom of developers"?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Emiliano.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dng mailing list
>> Dng@???
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>>
>>
>