Hi Jude,
I just saw the header:
#include <fskit/fskit.h>
in "fuse/fskit_fuse.h". So 'libfskit-fuse' depens on 'libfskit'.
Thanks,
Aitor.
On 10/11/15 20:43, Jude Nelson wrote:
> Hi aitor_czr,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:25 AM, aitor_czr <aitor_czr@???
> <mailto:aitor_czr@gnuinos.org>> wrote:
>
> I uploaded fskit to gitlab:
>
> https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/fskit/tree/gbp-master
>
>
> That's a very outdated version of fskit. The latest one (the one
> consistent with vdev) is in github: https://github.com/jcnelson/fskit
>
>
>
> I didn't see the dpkg template in 'contrib/debian'. That blindness !!
>
> Now, i see some significant differences between this template and
> mine. In my opinion:
>
> 1.- '/usr/lib/libfskit.so' and 'usr/lib/libfskit_fuse.so'
> dinamical libraries must be included in the respective
> *-dev.install files, instead of 'libfskit.install' and
> 'libfskit-fuse.install'.
>
> 2.- libfskit depends on libfskit-fuse and not the other way
> around, because libfskit-fuse is the backend (I did it so in Netman).
>
> Isn't it?
>
>
> It's the other way around: libfskit-fuse depends on libfskit. But
> unless you're packaging vdevfs along with vdevd, you don't need
> libfskit at all :)
>
> HTH,
> Jude
::
Re: [DNG] Packaging vdev
