Hi Mark,

I put something like that you said in one of my posts: "The Bazaar has
become Cathedral"

http://www.linuxito.com/15-miscelaneo/478-el-bazar-se-ha-convertido-en-catedral

Maybe freedom of developers it's more important than freedom of code.


On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Mark Purcell <raindog222@???> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> It does feel like this is a moment when we might want to consider whether
> the really important distinction is not so much between open-source
> software and closed-source software (since that battle does appear to be
> trending thoroughly in favor of the former), but between software
> developed, distributed, and maintained by corporations, and software
> developed, distributed, and maintained by non-corporate groups (whether
> those be 'community,' or 'community-based', or popular, or non-profit, or
> foundation, or grass-roots, etc.
>
> Best,
> Mark
>
>
> On 11/05/2015 01:48 AM, KatolaZ wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:27:02PM -0500, Steven W. Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmmm... things are getting clearerer.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://recode.net/2015/11/04/microsoft-and-red-hat-team-up-to-offer-linux-on-azure-cloud/
>>>
>>> SWS
>>>
>> Things have always been very clear, at least to me, since
>> 2003-2005. And when I used to say "beware of RedHat" back in the days,
>> people just thought I was mad accusing one of the "champions" of the
>> OpenSource/FreeSoftware movement. I really hope that this time my guts
>> feelings about the final aims of the potterization process will be
>> just wrong...
>>
>> HND
>>
>> KatolaZ
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>