Autor: aitor_czr Data: A: Dng, frits Assumpte: Re: [DNG] bootstrap-base error Re: About the experimental, live,
DVD
This is the issue:
The version of the sources of libdebian-installer4 is 0.97 and some
packages in the system (like 'cdebootstrap' and 'main-menu.udeb') are
depending on it. Despite that, the version of the packages:
On 16/10/15 11:07, aitor_czr wrote: > Hi Frits,
>
> - cdebootstrap deb package depends on libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.97)
>
> - main-menu udeb package depends on libdebian-installer4-udeb (>= 0.101)
>
> But the version of both 'libdebian-installer-extra4' and
> 'libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb' in Devuan's repository is
> 0.99+deb8u1. The sources of the package are right, becase
> debian/changelog says:
>
> libdebian-installer (0.97) unstable; urgency=low
>
> and debian/control:
>
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libdebian-installer4 (=
> ${binary:Version})
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libdebian-installer4-udeb
> (= ${binary:Version})
>
> for each package (libdebian-installer-extra4 and
> libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb, respectively). However, the versions
> of them in the repository (=0.99+deb8u1) don't correspond with the
> sources (=0.97).
>
> This fact would be the origin of the issue.
>
> Aitor.
>
> On 14/10/15 21:29, Godefridus Daalmans <frits@???> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> >
>>> >a short update: Now I added the debian-installer component to my
>>> >experimental live DVD, and I can try to do an installation, but it
>>> >screws up in "installing the base system"
>>> >
>>> >INFO: Menu item 'bootstrap-base' selected
>>> >base-installer: error: exiting on error
>>> >base-installer/debootstrap-failed
>>> >WARNING **: Configuring 'bootstrap-base' failed with error code 1
>>> >WARNING **: Menu item 'bootstrap-base' failed.
>>> >
>>> >on the installation screen, it complained about the checksum of
>>> >debian-installer/Packages.gz and debian-installer/Packages
>>> >
>>> >This seems to be a recurring error over the years with Debian and
>>> >Ubuntu...
>>> >
>>> >I verified the MD5 checksums and they are all OK, so that's not the
>>> >*real* problem.
>>> >
>>> >Any hints??
>>> >
>>> >Frits