Hi,

I am coding the final function before I can upload the latest changes
to the backend to support ethN and wlanN.

Please, be aware that this time, there have been many changes compared
to other uploads.

Edward

On 10/10/2015, Edward Bartolo <edbarx@???> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The frontend GUI presently does not match what the backend can do
> which still is unable to support wlanN and ethN. Currently, I am
> working on enabling the backend to handle wlanN and ethN. However, as
> I expected, the code has become far more complicated than before, and
> I am still debugging it.
>
> Currently, I am also engaged doing some 'gardening' to grow my
> vegetables as I am having stomach and bowel pain due to
> 'uncontrolled' pesticide use by vegetable sellers.
>
> Regarding the GUI being intuitive, I am afraid, I cannot satisfy
> everyone. Huge commercial software companies also write software that
> needs users to get accustomed to. A huge case in point was when
> Microsoft replaced menus in Microsoft Office, but still, there are
> office power users who claim, the new office design is more productive
> and more intuitive.
>
> It is quite clear that what is obvious and intuitive to person A may
> not be obvious to some other person B.
>
> However, I will make the changes you mentioned. The Network Interfaces
> Files tab will be recaptioned to Saved Connections.
>
> Edward
>
> On 10/10/2015, fsmithred <fsmithred@???> wrote:
>> It does compile and run on sid.
>>
>>
>> Some thoughts on ease of use...
>>
>> If you try to connect without selecting a connection, there's an error
>> message saying that you need to select a connection, but it's not obvious
>> what to select. The physical interface list is showing, and that's not
>> what you need to select. (Yeah, I tried connecting a few times with wlan0
>> highlighted before I remembered what I was supposed to be doing.)
>>
>> A simple fix would be to change the label on the tab from "Network
>> Interface Files" to something like "Connections" or "Saved connections".
>> Likewise, if you auto-connect while the physical interface tab is
>> showing,
>> you don't know where you're connecting. The progress message at the
>> bottom
>> of the window that says "Connecting..." would be more helpful if it named
>> the essid you were connecting to. (I think someone else mentioned this,
>> so
>> maybe you changed it already.) Or maybe put the interface files tab in
>> front - that's the one most people will use, isn't it?
>>
>> -fsr
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/07/2015 10:56 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>>> One more thing. I tried it on sid, and got:
>>>> "bash: /usr/bin/netman: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error"
>>>> Does it need to be compiled on sid to run on sid?
>>>
>>> I presume yes.
>>>
>>> Edward
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2015, Edward Bartolo <edbarx@???> wrote:
>>>> fsmithred, the backend still needs to be modified for those changes.
>>>> Only the frontend has the changes. So, you have to wait for my next
>>>> git push which will involve the backend mostly.
>>>>
>>>> Edward
>>>>
>>>> On 07/10/2015, fsmithred <fsmithred@???> wrote:
>>>>> Yes, the link looks better.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm testing the version you uploaded about 19 hours ago (aaof46...)
>>>>> and running into some problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> The main window, upper left, says"Using: Wifi: wlan1, Wired: eth0" but
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> actually using wlan0. The connection information window correctly
>>>>> shows
>>>>> wlan0 in use.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I try to change the default device, and I enter either wlan0 or
>>>>> wlan1,
>>>>> I get "Invalid device name. Valid characters are: a-z, A-Z, 0-9."
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I see I have to enter the wired device, too. With both fields
>>>>> filled,
>>>>> I get a different error.
>>>>> "Unable to create file
>>>>> "/home/user/.config/netman/netman.default.devices".
>>>>>
>>>>> If I create that file manually, then changing the default device
>>>>> completes, and the file gets the right information. Did it a second
>>>>> time
>>>>> to change the device, and the file was updated correctly.
>>>>>
>>>>> One more thing. I tried it on sid, and got:
>>>>> "bash: /usr/bin/netman: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error"
>>>>> Does it need to be compiled on sid to run on sid?
>>>>>
>>>>> Other than that, it seems to be working fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> -fsr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/07/2015 07:57 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is the latest screenshot. I removed the ugly huge button and
>>>>>> replaced it with a hyperlink. In the screenshot, the hyperlink has
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> mouse pointer above it although the pointer is not captured.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://postimg.org/image/4xzp8srht/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07/10/2015, Edward Bartolo <edbarx@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>> If you're already getting a list of devices to display, couldn't
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> verify that the chosen device matches one of those names? I don't
>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>> what it's like to test for illegal characters in the language
>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>> using, but I can tell you it's a pain in the ass in bash.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it is a good idea. List the available devices using ip link,
>>>>>>> extract a list of available network interfaces, and verify that the
>>>>>>> devices loaded from netman.default.devices is a valid device.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/10/2015, fsmithred <fsmithred@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>> One connection at a time should be enough for anyone. (Or they can
>>>>>>>> edit
>>>>>>>> their interfaces file.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you're already getting a list of devices to display, couldn't
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> verify that the chosen device matches one of those names? I don't
>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>> what it's like to test for illegal characters in the language
>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>> using, but I can tell you it's a pain in the ass in bash.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -fsr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/06/2015 03:28 PM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, the frontend can create a text file to declare a default wifi
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> ethernet devices. Since this file is writable by ordinary
>>>>>>>>> unprivileged
>>>>>>>>> users, and because the file will be used by the backend to decide
>>>>>>>>> which devices to use in cases where such a file exists, I am
>>>>>>>>> thinking
>>>>>>>>> about validating the device names before using popen or execl. The
>>>>>>>>> validation will check for illegal characters like shell delimiters
>>>>>>>>> which can be inserted by malicious users to run malicious
>>>>>>>>> commands.
>>>>>>>>> My
>>>>>>>>> impression is that device names will be composed of letters from
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> English alphabet and digits with all other characters unallowed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With the backend directly accessing the text file, additional
>>>>>>>>> parameters to define the network interface to use will be avoided
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>> both Connect and Disconnect. This means, the backend command set
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> remain unaltered.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 06/10/2015, Edward Bartolo <edbarx@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to run more than one instance of netman?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, only the previous versions allow more than one instance of
>>>>>>>>>> netman
>>>>>>>>>> to run. The current one I am working on (not yet pushed to git)
>>>>>>>>>> prevents users from running more than one instance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Edward
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 06/10/2015, Clarke Sideroad <clarke.sideroad@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/06/2015 09:24 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In the case of more than one wifi and/or more than one ethernet
>>>>>>>>>>>> connector, netman will either use decide by itself to use a
>>>>>>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>>>>>>> from the available list or choose a device from the defaults
>>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>> the user.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think, netman should not support more than one active
>>>>>>>>>>>> connection
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> is currently the case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give feedback so that I start to work on the backend.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There are cases when multiple connections and networks do come
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> handy,
>>>>>>>>>>> but I think in those cases we are dealing with things that might
>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> better off started separately going back to the basics. AFAIK
>>>>>>>>>>> Wicd
>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>> handles one connection at a time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to run more than one instance of netman?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Clarke
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dng mailing list
>>>>> Dng@???
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>