:: Re: [DNG] netman: support for wlan1…
Top Pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Auteur: Edward Bartolo
Datum:  
Aan: David Hare
CC: dng
Onderwerp: Re: [DNG] netman: support for wlan1, wlan2, ... and eth1, eth2, .... and new systemd's naming scheme
Hi David,

The new device naming scheme will be supported. Regarding listing
'lo', I was told to filter it off the list of devices. At the moment I
am concentrating on the frontend before I start to code support for
enp**** and wl****. The reason is to have a clear view of what I
should code in the backend.

Edward



On 04/10/2015, David Hare <davidahare@???> wrote:
> Some observations, testing netman.
>
> I have a (devuan-based) installation running eudev. The (usb) wireless
> device shows as wlan0 and netman works fine. As this machine is a fixed
> tower it doesn't normally need netman gui so my autostart calls this,
> and it works:
>
> xterm -title "Connecting to network..." -e "/usr/lib/netman/bin/backend 10"
>
> I would like to do similar before user login, maybe with an initscript.
>
> WICD and its ******* dbus reliance is now sacked for this machine.
>
> I have also live-images with eudev, unfortunately they can't use netman
> so far because:
>
> root@exefce:/home/user# iwconfig
> lo        no wireless extensions.

>
> enp5s4    no wireless extensions.

>
> enp2s0    no wireless extensions.

>
> wlp0s29f7u3  IEEE 802.11bg  ESSID:off/any
>            Mode:Managed  Access Point: Not-Associated   Tx-Power=0 dBm
>            Retry short limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
>            Encryption key:off
>            Power Management:on

>
> Those interfaces (except "lo") do show in netman's main window. However:
>
> wlan0: ERROR while getting interface flags: No such device
>
> ERROR: power_scan(): "/sbin/ifconfig wlan0 up" did not exit successfully
> (status=255).
>
> I hope this can be fixed soon. I built from latest git with
> dpkg-buildpackage, using the debian.tar.xz available with the netman deb
> package. BTW the build-deps list don't include build-essential, which
> was necessary although everything else was straightforward. I was a bit
> disturbed that they were around 900MB to install.
>
> (minor irritation) the "gnome foot" icon!
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>