Hi natacha,The first four sections look pretty standard.
But if you haven't done a fairly accurate assessment of how the community actually getswork done, it's highly unlikely that what is written about governance will reflect reality.  Insteadit will confuse and frustrate newcomers, who will be forced to learn two sets of "rules"-- oneofficial one that's clear yet largely ineffectual, the other unspoken, complex, and real.  (Thereare also many other problems that can happen from this, but that alone should be sufficientto be persuasive.

-Jonathan

     On Monday, September 28, 2015 4:16 AM, natacha <natacha@???> wrote:

Agree
Indeed thats the issue,
And also the reason why things need to be though in a different manner
hence not bureaucratic.
n.







On 09/28/2015 10:04 AM, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> Didn't the Debian Constitution ultimately help in screwing that
> distro up? Or was it some other bureaucratic device?
> _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list
> Dng@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
>

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@???
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng