Lazbuild doen't exit as a package, but it would be more appropiate
fp-compiler (freepascal) than lazarus.

Aitor.

On 16/09/15 05:51, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi Aitor,
>
> Lazarus IDE may not be a hard dependency as it can be avoided by
> directly building netman using lazbuild.
>
> The version number should appropriately be 0.1.0 as this is the first
> version and still needs maturation to become proper version 1.0
>
> Edward
>
> On 15/09/2015, aitor_czr<aitor_czr@???> wrote:
>> >The only error hurled by lintian is:
>> >

>> >    "Could not find a profile matching "{VENDOR}/main" for vendor devuan
>> >at /usr/bin/lintian line 979."

>> >
>> >On the other hand, what about the number version of the package?
>> >
>> >0.1.0 ??
>> >
>> >1.0 ??
>> >
>> >Aitor.
>> >
>> >On 15/09/15 15:30, aitor_czr wrote:
>>> >>I think that the dependencies of netman are the following:
>>> >>
>>> >>Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50), gcc, lazarus, dh-python,
>>> >>python-all-dev
>>> >>"netman-gui" deps -> netman-backend, libatk1.0-0, libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0,
>>> >>libglib2.0-0, libpango-1.0-0, libx11-6
>>> >>"netman-backend" deps -> libc-bin
>>> >>
>>> >>Aitor.
>>> >>
>>>> >>> Now i must to hit with the correct dependencies. All the rest is
>>>> >>> done. So, now i need some time to build it into a chroot jail using
>>>> >>> pbuilder, etc..