Mr. X will find that A & B do not like what he does and sooner or later he realizes that he does not understand all what A and B exchanging despite all his money … Its not a battle that finishes after the enemy is killed its competition where ever new improvements are found to protect A's and B's interests.


On 08.09.2015, at 20:45, Pablo <pablovidal85@???> wrote:

> And Illegal in the way that Mr. X do not consent A to send the latest hollywood movie to B over the channel, so I guess Mr. X, who has a lot of money to spend on lawyers and politicians, will win the battle anyway.
>
> 2015-09-08 14:56 GMT+02:00 Otto Meier <ottomeier95@???>:
>
> Illegal in the way that A and/or B do not consent that a Mr. X is listening when A has a chat with B and use the obtained information to create a claim.
>
>
> On 08.09.2015, at 14:15, Pablo <pablovidal85@???> wrote:
>
>> Exactly, you cannot be sure, and given how easy it is to share bits you'll have to assume that likely there is some sharing going on. Not sure what do mean with "illegal way", content providers and ISPs have been teaming up to inspect internet packets since the technology is available in most developed countries. Obviously not everybody can in practice do it, it takes infrastructure and the right amount of money in the pockets of politicians.
>>
>> 2015-09-08 8:30 GMT+02:00 Otto Meier <ottomeier95@???>:
>>
>> One can not be sure (nobody shares) but within a contract you could define a remedy for the harm that is done to you by not fulfilling the contract.
>>
>> You mean obtaining in an illegal way (without consent) Information (in some jurisdictions) should be accepted as a proper proof?! Ok, then I go to court and claim $ 1 Mio. damage from A because B told C that A stole it. What will a judge say/decide?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07.09.2015, at 22:56, Pablo <pablovidal85@???> wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately eavesdropping is the only way to enforce intellectual property rights, how else will you protect your property from being shared without your consent? And I mean in practice, because what will you do in a court if you have no proof that your property was shared?
>>>
>>> 2015-09-07 20:14 GMT+02:00 Otto Meier <ottomeier95@???>:
>>>
>>> Mr. X listening to a private communication in which intellectual property (“Happy B’day”) is exchanged is not enforcing intellectual property rights, that’s eavesdropping (secretly listen to a conversation), a violation of my privacy, depending on where you live. Going to court is (peacefully) enforcing your rights e.g. on intellectual property with all its difficulties.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07.09.2015, at 18:38, Pablo <pablovidal85@???> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Call it whatever you are more confortable with, but if you cannot deprive anybody from it, is not your private property. It may be your shared property with the receiver, until the receiver shares it with somebody else. Mr X listening to communications is something I would expect in a state where intellectual property rights exist, you know, contractual obligations have to be enforced.
>>>>
>>>> 2015-09-07 16:27 GMT+02:00 Otto Meier <ottomeier95@???>:
>>>> Beg to differ.
>>>>
>>>> If A says to B “Happy Birthday”. What B does with it later on, e.g. telling C, hey A called and said “H.. …” is his thing. Mr. X listening, before B talks, doesn’t deserve respect.
>>>>
>>>> What happens if A says to B “Happy Birthday but don’t tell anyone”? B might or not talk. Mr. X listening, before B talks, doesn’t deserve respect.
>>>>
>>>> Or, if A contacts B and asks “I would like to share some Info with you but only when you do not share it with anyone else, do you agree?”. B agrees. Mr. X listening all the way doesn’t deserve respect.
>>>>
>>>> If one puts communication/information in a contractual context information stays private property without massive surveillance systems, its a kind of non disclosure agreement. Of course if you don’t trust B serving the contract you get paranoid and become Mr. X listening to all and everything.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The very definition of communication goes against the concept of private property, once you share the information you lost the capacity of depriving the rest of the world of it. What strong encryption provides is just secured communication channels and that's about it. I find people who supports intellectual property and privacy rights at the same time amusing, because you know, the only way we have to enforce property rights on information is precisely having full control of it, using massive surveillance systems.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-09-07 8:44 GMT+02:00 Otto Meier <ottomeier95@???>:
>>>>> Why: What I say to someone else is my property I decide with whom to share it. Its my decision. Its a principle. It doesn’t matter what it is, a subversive comment or a Happy Birthday note. I do not want anyone else to read it! Whoever doesn’t respect that doesn’t deserve my respect...
>>>>>> "communications being intercepted and who we speak to known to people we would like to conceal this from is that once we have The Perfect end-to-end encrypted, decentralised, distributed, privacy preserving communication tool that everybody in the world uses, we actually don’t have anything meaningful to say over it."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dude, there has been a constant in history which is that most people don't have anything meaningful to say in any medium. Let the general populace cannibalize themselves, that's their choice, but those who are actually alive need a way to communicate without prosecution. Stop worrying about everyone else and focus on the things that you as an individual find important. Similar individuals who share a vision will be drawn together. It's never been about saving the world and it never will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What one finds worthless might for someone else something...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2015 3:21 PM, "Arturo Filastò" <arturo@???> wrote:
>>>>>> I apologise in advance if what I talk about may appear to be a little be off topic, but by reading this thread and in particular the words of Jaromil and Amir I believe this is fertile ground in which to express some of my ideas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The more time goes by the more disillusioned I become about some aspects of these so called “movements” close to the anarcho-libertarian-crypto-paranoia sub-system.
>>>>>> What actually worries me much more than all of our communications being intercepted and who we speak to known to people we would like to conceal this from is that once we have The Perfect end-to-end encrypted, decentralised, distributed, privacy preserving communication tool that everybody in the world uses, we actually don’t have anything meaningful to say over it.
>>>>>> What use is crypto and these tools to us if we don’t have an idea or a plan as to what we should do with it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see this brainwashing being particularly prevalent in the Berlin scene and it makes me sick and that is one of the reasons why some years ago I fled the city promising to never live here again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other aspect is that I sometimes have some serious problems understanding what are the motivations and the ideals underpinning the behaviours of certain people in this realm and have been stung by this in the past. Said differently it doesn’t mean that if two people are interested in doing the same thing, they are both doing it for the same reason. The reason, in my opinion, is actually the most important thing and agree on what to do is just not enough, we should also agree on WHY we do it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This lack of vision and common shared objective makes me often doubt if I should continue focussing on what it is I am focussing on and if I should instead move to tackle other more important and relevant problems.
>>>>>> The times I have stopped a moment to look around and listen to what the earth is telling us I realise that surveillance and technological control is only just a small piece of this puzzle. If we continue in what we are doing, in not too long we will completely fuck ourselves. We have actually already fucked ourselves, the club of Rome warned us of this already in 1972, but nobody listened to their warning that if nothing were to be done there would not be any turning back. We are now too late. We are fucked. All we can do is extend our the lifetime of humanity, but what has been done is the last century is now IRREVERSIBLE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Going back to the main topic in question I have a hard time understanding why certain people are doing what they do. To make an example I don’t understand why Cody Wilson is so much into this idea of making guns. What is the vision there? What is the end goal?
>>>>>> Is it really necessary to fuck up a beautiful technology such as 3d printing to make a political statement? In a way it’s as if somebody were to publish schemes on how to use enzymes to build a bioweapon, hence realising the threat that people proposing more regulation on biohacking are using to justify it.
>>>>>> Groups in the past have overthrown their own government without the need of 3d printed guns and let’s be frank you are not going to supply an army with plastic guns and expect them to have a chance against the US government. I’m sorry, but I just don’t buy it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Again I am sorry if this is a long off-topic rant, but I wanted to get these things off my chest and I hope that somebody here can in some way relate to it. Some of the people I have spoken to about ideas have not given the importance I believe this problem deserves and I believe this is caused by the anarcho-libertarian-crypto-paranoia sect brainwashing that I see going on all around me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~ Arturo
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem