:: Re: [unSYSTEM] Charged over encrypt…
Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: psy
Date:  
À: System undo crew
Sujet: Re: [unSYSTEM] Charged over encryption software

On 02/09/15 13:33, Sam wrote:
> Agreed. We must make many common day things, like basic email, use encryption
> software. And I'm not talking about GPG. I'm talking inherently encrypted p2p
> messaging.


Exactly.

For example, I see like a good strategy to provide 'client side'
encryption and create strong layers of privacy over 'server side' API's.
Just to complement it. But this is openning another debate that is
worldwide on the table, about the possibility of criminalize just for
have -pentesting- software tools on a computer. For example, in Spain
they are trying to create a kind of "pentester certificate" and some
lists of white hackers. Probably to have more easy who is ready to be
called on a "national security" problem and to identify grey-hats and
other tribus more easily.

About client side encryption, I think is not easy to deploy and require
to code on 'corporate way' (with they rules). This is giving to them a
value more than to other platforms.

Probably is more clean to win the battle of services, creating
alternatives to FB, Twitter, etc.. with a strong transparent encryption
but looks more hard to reach.


>
> Sam
>
> On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 01:28:01 PM psy wrote:
>> Turkey official tells Al Jazeera charges made after fixer found to have
>> encryption software used by ISIL on his laptop....
>>
>> http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/09/vice-news-fixer-arrested-encryption-so
>> ftware-150901200622345.html
>>
>> ....
>>
>> It is increasingly clear that the world's governments see the encryption
>> tool as a threat to the repression. I begin to see many similar news..
>>
>> In the following years they will try to ban it "legally" with the
>> complicity of the manufacturers and big IT companies (that will
>> implement ONLY in-secure encryption breakeable by secret agencies).
>>
>> We have to remember that 'encrypt' will be a crime shortly.
>>
>> Maybe agood way to avoid this is to make more widespread encryption. If
>> not, will be so easy to them recognize who is using encryption just
>> sniffing traffic massively.
>>
>> What's your opinion?. Let's brainstorm some strategies...
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem